来月经有什么症状| 灭活疫苗是什么意思| 荔枝补什么| 手掌心有痣代表什么| 又热又冷是什么原因| 什么是龙骨| b超是检查什么的| 7月22号是什么星座| 枯草热是什么病| 无声无息是什么意思| 什么是强直性脊柱炎| 低血压和低血糖有什么区别| 血压什么时间测量最准| 龟头责是什么意思| vfu是什么牌子| 草字头加西念什么| 胃气上逆是什么原因造成的| 斑秃用什么药| 看痘痘挂什么科| 杰克琼斯属于什么档次| 动手术后吃什么对伤口恢复比较快| 达英35是什么药| 葡萄糖有什么作用| 女人阴虚是什么意思| 鸡奸什么意思| 什么是唐氏综合征| 丹参滴丸和丹参片有什么区别| 乙酰氨基酚片是什么药| 圣诞节的礼物什么时候送| 女性外阴痒用什么药| 子宫穿孔有什么症状| 香港脚是什么症状图片| 苏联是什么国家| 亲吻是什么感觉| 好聚好散是什么意思| 胎位不正是什么原因导致的| 什么情况下要打狂犬疫苗| 肝素帽是什么| 肾结石是什么原因导致的| 青春痘用什么药膏擦最好呢| 喝姜粉有什么好处| 软禁是什么意思| 透明的什么填词语| 鸡蛋和什么不能一起吃| 轻微脑梗吃什么药| 为什么会胃疼| 有什么聚会玩的游戏| 什么是气胸有什么症状| 温碧泉适合什么年龄| 背道而驰是什么意思| 骨密度增高是什么意思| 体力不支是什么意思| 七夕节的含义是什么| 墓志铭什么意思| 肚脐下三寸是什么位置| 胰腺炎适合吃什么食物| 黑色的猫是什么品种| 什么名字最霸气| 下葬下雨是什么兆头| 女性白细胞高是什么原因| cnv是什么意思| 四氯化碳是什么| 四川有什么好吃的| 男人阴虱用什么药| 三八妇女节送老婆什么礼物好| 长期便秘是什么原因| 全身发麻是什么原因| close是什么意思| 伤官配印是什么意思| 专硕和学硕有什么区别| 心脏不舒服做什么检查| 接站是什么意思| 211大学是什么意思| 逍遥丸适合什么人吃| 梦见和邻居吵架什么预兆| 胆囊结石吃什么食物好| 上当是什么意思| 2006年属什么生肖| 莳是什么意思| 右肺纤维灶是什么意思| 左手食指有痣代表什么| 骨质疏松打什么针| 流年是什么意思| 没有舌苔是什么原因| 群众路线是什么| 什么是呆账| 龙和什么相冲| 白油是什么| 子嗣是什么意思| 小孩流鼻血挂什么科| dvf是什么品牌| 月经不调去医院要做什么检查| 龙骨为什么比排骨便宜| 粟是什么农作物| 侏罗纪是什么意思| 甲状腺属于什么科| 地屈孕酮片什么时候吃| 10月29号是什么星座| 布洛芬吃多了有什么副作用| 肺部结节是什么原因引起的| 受是什么意思| 同事过生日送什么礼物| 东吴在现在什么地方| 氯高是什么原因| 三顾茅庐的顾是什么意思| 草芽是什么| 什么饭不能吃| 毒龙是什么意思啊| 号外是什么意思| 石斛什么价格| 生生不息是什么意思| 吃腰果有什么好处| 王玉什么字| 什么工作赚钱| 霉菌性阴道炎用什么药最好| 每天一杯蜂蜜水有什么好处| 血糖高的人吃什么水果| 后腰出汗多是什么原因| 双瞳电影到底讲了什么| 后背酸痛是什么原因| 跌打损伤用什么药好得快| 蜘蛛属于什么类动物| 口蘑是什么蘑菇| 炒锅买什么材质的好| 妈富隆是什么药| 俄罗斯用什么货币| 龙胆草长什么样| 小孩咳嗽有痰吃什么药| 河豚是什么意思| 桐字属于五行属什么| 破瓦法是什么| 沉的右边念什么| 沙棘对肝脏有什么好处| 树膏皮是什么皮| 珉字五行属什么| tag什么意思| 肌酐高有什么症状表现| 做梦梦见前男友是什么意思| 晚上头疼是什么原因| 什么叫平仓| 什么太空| 李叔同为什么出家| 杜鹃花是什么颜色| 小孩子打呼噜是什么原因| 失孤什么意思| 1951属什么生肖| 口腔溃疡吃什么水果| 具体是什么意思| 肚子不舒服吃什么药| 玻璃体切除后对眼睛有什么影响| 甲亢吃什么好| 什么药治牙疼最快| 内心os是什么意思| 早上起床腰疼是什么原因| hpv和tct有什么区别| 气机是什么意思| 夜幕降临是什么意思| 甘油三酯高是什么意思| 禁锢是什么意思| 泮是什么意思| 水滴鱼长什么样子| 核桃和什么一起打豆浆| 三教九流代表什么生肖| 糖类抗原ca125偏高是什么原因| 什么叫低级别上皮内瘤变| hpv59高危阳性是什么意思| 什么食物含叶黄素最多| 什么原因引起荨麻疹| 陕西什么面| 四个口是什么字| 什么叫凤凰男| 甲亢适合吃什么食物| 为什么月经会推迟| 花甲炒什么配菜好吃| 今年什么时候立秋| od什么意思| 刻板是什么意思| 大便硬是什么原因| 对公转账是什么意思| 老鼠属于什么类动物| 福州有什么好玩的地方| 5年生存率是什么意思| 阴疽是什么病| 经期吃什么让血量增加| 什么样的人可以通灵| 手指甲软薄吃什么补| 肌无力是什么症状| 阑尾炎是什么引起的| 1.8是什么星座| 百合有什么功效| 干咳吃什么药最有效| 产后为什么脸部松弛| 坐飞机不能带什么东西| 低密度脂蛋白低是什么原因| 蓝加红是什么颜色| 海椒是什么辣椒| 射手是什么星座| polo villae是什么档次| 萨瓦迪卡什么意思| 心肌酶高是什么原因| 叔叔的儿子叫什么| 什么的木筏| 不宁腿综合症是什么原因引起的| 治疗神经痛用什么药最有效| 肺炎是什么原因引起的| 喝玉米水有什么好处| 玫瑰糠疹是什么病| 六月初九是什么星座| 减肥吃什么玉米| 癫狂是什么意思| 乌黑乌黑的什么| 小腹左侧疼是什么原因| 嘴角发黑是什么原因| 支气管病变什么意思| 手指麻木吃什么药| 乳腺发炎有什么症状| 晚上睡觉出虚汗是什么原因| 感冒了吃什么水果比较好| 为什么会生化妊娠| 肋骨突出是什么原因| 耳鸣是什么| 月经三个月没来是什么原因| 高潮是什么感觉| 罗锅是什么意思| 杏色配什么颜色好看| 为什么一喝牛奶就拉肚子| 耳毛念什么| 梦见小白兔是什么意思| 血栓是什么| 为什么16岁不能吃维生素B| 梦见织毛衣是什么意思| 山麻雀吃什么| 白绫是什么意思| 生吃黄瓜有什么好处| 干燥剂是什么成分| 饮鸩止渴是什么意思| 反流性食管炎是什么病| 腿弯疼是什么原因| 奶茶里面的珍珠是什么做的| 小猫的特点是什么| 小儿鼻炎用什么药好| 24k金是什么意思| 梦见很多蛇是什么征兆| 公鸡的尾巴有什么作用| 鲁是什么意思| 台湾海峡属于什么海| 什么人从来不看医生| 转氨酶高是什么问题| 脑梗有什么症状| 为什么会流鼻血什么原因引起的| 斯德哥尔摩综合征是什么| 鳖吃什么| 左脚麻是什么原因| 气管炎的症状吃什么药好得快| 小便黄是什么原因引起的| 多汗症是什么原因引起的| 什么样的人容易高反| 世界上最大的鱼是什么| 身体容易青紫是什么原因| 鲁迅是著名的什么家| 茉莉花茶有什么功效| 吃什么好| mac是什么牌子| 牙齿一碰就疼是什么原因| 百度

文化部离退休人员服务中心举办老年文化学习讲座

百度   日本首相安倍晋三夫妇近期因森友学园地价门事件心烦不已。

The observable universe is a spherical region of the universe consisting of all matter that can be observed from Earth; the electromagnetic radiation from these objects has had time to reach the Solar System and Earth since the beginning of the cosmological expansion. Assuming the universe is isotropic, the distance to the edge of the observable universe is the same in every direction. That is, the observable universe is a spherical region centered on the observer. Every location in the universe has its own observable universe, which may or may not overlap with the one centered on Earth.

Observable universe
Visualization of the observable universe. The scale is such that the fine grains represent collections of large numbers of superclusters. The Virgo Supercluster—home of Milky Way—is marked at the center, but is too small to be seen.
Diameter8.8×1026 m or 880 Ym (28.5 Gpc or 93 Gly)[1]
Circumference2.764×1027 m or 2.764 Rm (89.6 Gpc or 292.2 Gly)
Volume3.566×1080 m3[2]
Mass (ordinary matter)1.5×1053 kg[3]
Density (of total energy)8.5×10?27 kg/m3 (equivalent to ~5 protons per cubic meter of space)[3]
Age13.787±0.020 billion years[4]
Average temperature2.72548±0.00057 K[5]
Contents

The word observable in this sense does not refer to the capability of modern technology to detect light or other information from an object, or whether there is anything to be detected. It refers to the physical limit created by the speed of light itself. No signal can travel faster than light, hence there is a maximum distance, called the particle horizon, beyond which nothing can be detected, as the signals could not have reached the observer yet.

According to calculations, the current comoving distance to particles from which the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) was emitted, which represents the radius of the visible universe, is about 14.0 billion parsecs (about 45.7 billion light-years). The comoving distance to the edge of the observable universe is about 14.3 billion parsecs (about 46.6 billion light-years),[7] about 2% larger. The radius of the observable universe is therefore estimated to be about 46.5 billion light-years.[8][9] Using the critical density and the diameter of the observable universe, the total mass of ordinary matter in the universe can be calculated to be about 1.5×1053 kg.[10] In November 2018, astronomers reported that extragalactic background light (EBL) amounted to 4×1084 photons.[11][12]

As the universe's expansion is accelerating, all currently observable objects, outside the local supercluster, will eventually appear to freeze in time, while emitting progressively redder and fainter light. For instance, objects with the current redshift z from 5 to 10 will only be observable up to an age of 4–6 billion years. In addition, light emitted by objects currently situated beyond a certain comoving distance (currently about 19 gigaparsecs (62 Gly)) will never reach Earth.[13]

Overview

edit
 
Observable Universe as a function of time and distance, in context of the expanding Universe

The universe's size is unknown, and it may be infinite in extent.[14] Some parts of the universe are too far away for the light emitted since the Big Bang to have had enough time to reach Earth or space-based instruments, and therefore lie outside the observable universe. In the future, light from distant galaxies will have had more time to travel, so one might expect that additional regions will become observable. Regions distant from observers (such as us) are expanding away faster than the speed of light, at rates estimated by Hubble's law.[note 1] The expansion rate appears to be accelerating, which dark energy was proposed to explain.

Assuming dark energy remains constant (an unchanging cosmological constant) so that the expansion rate of the universe continues to accelerate, there is a "future visibility limit" beyond which objects will never enter the observable universe at any time in the future because light emitted by objects outside that limit could never reach the Earth. Note that, because the Hubble parameter is decreasing with time, there can be cases where a galaxy that is receding from Earth only slightly faster than light emits a signal that eventually reaches Earth.[9][15] This future visibility limit is calculated at a comoving distance of 19 billion parsecs (62 billion light-years), assuming the universe will keep expanding forever, which implies the number of galaxies that can ever be theoretically observed in the infinite future is only larger than the number currently observable by a factor of 2.36 (ignoring redshift effects).[note 2]

In principle, more galaxies will become observable in the future; in practice, an increasing number of galaxies will become extremely redshifted due to ongoing expansion, so much so that they will seem to disappear from view and become invisible.[16][17][18] A galaxy at a given comoving distance is defined to lie within the "observable universe" if we can receive signals emitted by the galaxy at any age in its history, say, a signal sent from the galaxy only 500 million years after the Big Bang. Because of the universe's expansion, there may be some later age at which a signal sent from the same galaxy can never reach the Earth at any point in the infinite future, so, for example, we might never see what the galaxy looked like 10 billion years after the Big Bang,[13] even though it remains at the same comoving distance less than that of the observable universe.

This can be used to define a type of cosmic event horizon whose distance from the Earth changes over time. For example, the current distance to this horizon is about 16 billion light-years, meaning that a signal from an event happening at present can eventually reach the Earth if the event is less than 16 billion light-years away, but the signal will never reach the Earth if the event is further away.[9]

The space before this cosmic event horizon can be called "reachable universe", that is all galaxies closer than that could be reached if we left for them today, at the speed of light; all galaxies beyond that are unreachable.[19][20] Simple observation will show the future visibility limit (62 billion light-years) is exactly equal to the reachable limit (16 billion light-years) added to the current visibility limit (46 billion light-years).[21][7]

 
The reachable Universe as a function of time and distance, in context of the expanding Universe.

"The universe" versus "the observable universe"

edit

Both popular and professional research articles in cosmology often use the term "universe" to mean "observable universe".[citation needed] This can be justified on the grounds that we can never know anything by direct observation about any part of the universe that is causally disconnected from the Earth, although many credible theories require a total universe much larger than the observable universe.[citation needed] No evidence exists to suggest that the boundary of the observable universe constitutes a boundary on the universe as a whole, nor do any of the mainstream cosmological models propose that the universe has any physical boundary in the first place. However, some models propose it could be finite but unbounded,[note 3] like a higher-dimensional analogue of the 2D surface of a sphere that is finite in area but has no edge.

It is plausible that the galaxies within the observable universe represent only a minuscule fraction of the galaxies in the universe. According to the theory of cosmic inflation initially introduced by Alan Guth and D. Kazanas,[22] if it is assumed that inflation began about 10?37 seconds after the Big Bang and that the pre-inflation size of the universe was approximately equal to the speed of light times its age, that would suggest that at present the entire universe's size is at least 1.5×1034 light-years — this is at least 3×1023 times the radius of the observable universe.[23]

If the universe is finite but unbounded, it is also possible that the universe is smaller than the observable universe. In this case, what we take to be very distant galaxies may actually be duplicate images of nearby galaxies, formed by light that has circumnavigated the universe. It is difficult to test this hypothesis experimentally because different images of a galaxy would show different eras in its history, and consequently might appear quite different. Bielewicz et al.[24] claim to establish a lower bound of 27.9 gigaparsecs (91 billion light-years) on the diameter of the last scattering surface. This value is based on matching-circle analysis of the WMAP 7-year data. This approach has been disputed.[25]

Size

edit
 
Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image of a region of the observable universe (equivalent sky area size shown in bottom left corner), near the constellation Fornax. Each spot is a galaxy, consisting of billions of stars. The light from the smallest, most redshifted galaxies originated around 12.6 billion years ago,[26] close to the age of the universe.

The comoving distance from Earth to the edge of the observable universe is about 14.26 gigaparsecs (46.5 billion light-years or 4.40×1026 m) in any direction. The observable universe is thus a sphere with a diameter of about 28.5 gigaparsecs[27] (93 billion light-years or 8.8×1026 m).[28] Assuming that space is roughly flat (in the sense of being a Euclidean space), this size corresponds to a comoving volume of about 1.22×104 Gpc3 (4.22×105 Gly3 or 3.57×1080 m3).[29]

These are distances now (in cosmological time), not distances at the time the light was emitted. For example, the cosmic microwave background radiation that we see right now was emitted at the time of photon decoupling, estimated to have occurred about 380,000 years after the Big Bang,[30][31] which occurred around 13.8 billion years ago. This radiation was emitted by matter that has, in the intervening time, mostly condensed into galaxies, and those galaxies are now calculated to be about 46 billion light-years from Earth.[7][9] To estimate the distance to that matter at the time the light was emitted, we may first note that according to the Friedmann–Lema?tre–Robertson–Walker metric, which is used to model the expanding universe, if we receive light with a redshift of z, then the scale factor at the time the light was originally emitted is given by[32][33]

 .

WMAP nine-year results combined with other measurements give the redshift of photon decoupling as z = 1091.64±0.47,[34] which implies that the scale factor at the time of photon decoupling would be 1?1092.64. So if the matter that originally emitted the oldest CMBR photons has a present distance of 46 billion light-years, then the distance would have been only about 42 million light-years at the time of decoupling.

The light-travel distance to the edge of the observable universe is the age of the universe times the speed of light, 13.8 billion light years. This is the distance that a photon emitted shortly after the Big Bang, such as one from the cosmic microwave background, has traveled to reach observers on Earth. Because spacetime is curved, corresponding to the expansion of space, this distance does not correspond to the true distance at any moment in time.[35]

Matter and mass

edit

Number of galaxies and stars

edit

The observable universe contains as many as an estimated 2 trillion galaxies[36][37][38] and, overall, as many as an estimated 1024 stars[39][40] – more stars (and, potentially, Earth-like planets) than all the grains of beach sand on planet Earth.[41][42][43] Other estimates are in the hundreds of billions rather than trillions.[44][45][46] The estimated total number of stars in an inflationary universe (observed and unobserved) is 10100.[47]

Matter content—number of atoms

edit

Assuming the mass of ordinary matter is about 1.45×1053 kg as discussed above, and assuming all atoms are hydrogen atoms (which are about 74% of all atoms in the Milky Way by mass), the estimated total number of atoms in the observable universe is obtained by dividing the mass of ordinary matter by the mass of a hydrogen atom. The result is approximately 1080 hydrogen atoms, also known as the Eddington number.[48]

Mass of ordinary matter

edit

The mass of the observable universe is often quoted as 1053 kg.[49] In this context, mass refers to ordinary (baryonic) matter and includes the interstellar medium (ISM) and the intergalactic medium (IGM). However, it excludes dark matter and dark energy. This quoted value for the mass of ordinary matter in the universe can be estimated based on critical density. The calculations are for the observable universe only as the volume of the whole is unknown and may be infinite.

Estimates based on critical density

edit

Critical density is the energy density for which the universe is flat.[50] If there is no dark energy, it is also the density for which the expansion of the universe is poised between continued expansion and collapse.[51] From the Friedmann equations, the value for   critical density, is:[52]

 

where G is the gravitational constant and H = H0 is the present value of the Hubble constant. The value for H0, as given by the European Space Agency's Planck Telescope, is H0 = 67.15 kilometres per second per megaparsec. This gives a critical density of 0.85×10?26 kg/m3, or about 5 hydrogen atoms per cubic metre. This density includes four significant types of energy/mass: ordinary matter (4.8%), neutrinos (0.1%), cold dark matter (26.8%), and dark energy (68.3%).[53]

Although neutrinos are Standard Model particles, they are listed separately because they are ultra-relativistic and hence behave like radiation rather than like matter. The density of ordinary matter, as measured by Planck, is 4.8% of the total critical density or 4.08×10?28 kg/m3. To convert this density to mass we must multiply by volume, a value based on the radius of the "observable universe". Since the universe has been expanding for 13.8 billion years, the comoving distance (radius) is now about 46.6 billion light-years. Thus, volume (?4/3?πr3) equals 3.58×1080 m3 and the mass of ordinary matter equals density (4.08×10?28 kg/m3) times volume (3.58×1080 m3) or 1.46×1053 kg.

Large-scale structure

edit
 
Galaxy clusters, like RXC J0142.9+4438, are the nodes of the cosmic web that permeates the entire Universe.[54]
Video of a cosmological simulation of the local universe, showing the large-scale structure of galaxy clusters and dark matter.[55]

Sky surveys and mappings of the various wavelength bands of electromagnetic radiation (in particular 21-cm emission) have yielded much information on the content and character of the universe's structure. The organization of structure appears to follow a hierarchical model with organization up to the scale of superclusters and filaments. Larger than this (at scales between 30 and 200 megaparsecs),[56] there seems to be no continued structure, a phenomenon that has been referred to as the End of Greatness.[57] The shape of the large scale structure can be summarized by the matter power spectrum.

Cosmic Web: walls, filaments, nodes, and voids

edit
 
Map of the cosmic web generated from a slime mould-inspired algorithm[58]

The organization of structure arguably begins at the stellar level, though most cosmologists rarely address astrophysics on that scale. Stars are organized into galaxies, which in turn form galaxy groups, galaxy clusters, superclusters, sheets, walls and filaments, which are separated by immense voids, creating a vast foam-like structure[59] sometimes called the "cosmic web". Prior to 1989, it was commonly assumed that virialized galaxy clusters were the largest structures in existence, and that they were distributed more or less uniformly throughout the universe in every direction. However, since the early 1980s, more and more structures have been discovered. In 1983, Adrian Webster identified the Webster LQG, a large quasar group consisting of 5 quasars. The discovery was the first identification of a large-scale structure, and has expanded the information about the known grouping of matter in the universe.

In 1987, Robert Brent Tully identified the Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, the galaxy filament in which the Milky Way resides. It is about 1 billion light-years across. That same year, an unusually large region with a much lower than average distribution of galaxies was discovered, the Giant Void, which measures 1.3 billion light-years across. Based on redshift survey data, in 1989 Margaret Geller and John Huchra discovered the "Great Wall",[60] a sheet of galaxies more than 500 million light-years long and 200 million light-years wide, but only 15 million light-years thick. The existence of this structure escaped notice for so long because it requires locating the position of galaxies in three dimensions, which involves combining location information about the galaxies with distance information from redshifts.

Two years later, astronomers Roger G. Clowes and Luis E. Campusano discovered the Clowes–Campusano LQG, a large quasar group measuring two billion light-years at its widest point, which was the largest known structure in the universe at the time of its announcement. In April 2003, another large-scale structure was discovered, the Sloan Great Wall. In August 2007, a possible supervoid was detected in the constellation Eridanus.[61] It coincides with the 'CMB cold spot', a cold region in the microwave sky that is highly improbable under the currently favored cosmological model. This supervoid could cause the cold spot, but to do so it would have to be improbably big, possibly a billion light-years across, almost as big as the Giant Void mentioned above.

Unsolved problem in physics
The largest structures in the universe are larger than expected. Are these actual structures or random density fluctuations?
 
Computer simulated image of an area of space more than 50 million light-years across, presenting a possible large-scale distribution of light sources in the universe—precise relative contributions of galaxies and quasars are unclear.

Another large-scale structure is the SSA22 Protocluster, a collection of galaxies and enormous gas bubbles that measures about 200 million light-years across.

In 2011, a large quasar group was discovered, U1.11, measuring about 2.5 billion light-years across. On January 11, 2013, another large quasar group, the Huge-LQG, was discovered, which was measured to be four billion light-years across, the largest known structure in the universe at that time.[62] In November 2013, astronomers discovered the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall,[63][64] an even bigger structure twice as large as the former. It was defined by the mapping of gamma-ray bursts.[63][65]

In 2021, the American Astronomical Society announced the detection of the Giant Arc; a crescent-shaped string of galaxies that span 3.3 billion light years in length, located 9.2 billion light years from Earth in the constellation Bo?tes from observations captured by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.[66]

End of Greatness

edit

The End of Greatness is the name occasionally given to an observational scale around 100 Mpc (roughly 300 million light-years) where the lumpiness seen in the large-scale structure of the universe is homogenized and isotropized in accordance with the cosmological principle.[67] The "lumpiness" is quantified by computing a fractal dimension from observations.[68][69] The superclusters and filaments seen in smaller surveys are randomized to the extent that the smooth distribution of the universe is visually apparent. It was not until the redshift surveys of the 1990s were completed that this scale could accurately be observed.[57]

Observations

edit
 
"Panoramic view of the entire near-infrared sky reveals the distribution of galaxies beyond the Milky Way. The image is derived from the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog (XSC)—more than 1.5 million galaxies, and the Point Source Catalog (PSC)—nearly 0.5 billion Milky Way stars. The galaxies are color-coded by 'redshift' obtained from the UGC, CfA, Tully NBGC, LCRS, 2dF, 6dFGS, and SDSS surveys (and from various observations compiled by the NASA Extragalactic Database), or photo-metrically deduced from the K band (2.2 μm). Blue are the nearest sources (z < 0.01); green are at moderate distances (0.01 < z < 0.04) and red are the most distant sources that 2MASS resolves (0.04 < z < 0.1). The map is projected with an equal area Aitoff in the Galactic system (Milky Way at center)."[70]
 
Constellations grouped in galactic quadrants (N/S, 1–4) and their approximate divisions vis-a-vis celestial quadrants (NQ/SQ)

Another indicator of large-scale structure is the 'Lyman-alpha forest'. This is a collection of absorption lines that appear in the spectra of light from quasars, which are interpreted as indicating the existence of huge thin sheets of intergalactic (mostly hydrogen) gas. These sheets appear to collapse into filaments, which can feed galaxies as they grow where filaments either cross or are dense. An early direct evidence for this cosmic web of gas was the 2019 detection, by astronomers from the RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research in Japan and Durham University in the U.K., of light from the brightest part of this web, surrounding and illuminated by a cluster of forming galaxies, acting as cosmic flashlights for intercluster medium hydrogen fluorescence via Lyman-alpha emissions.[71][72]

In 2021, an international team, headed by Roland Bacon from the Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon (France), reported the first observation of diffuse extended Lyman-alpha emission from redshift 3.1 to 4.5 that traced several cosmic web filaments on scales of 2.5?4 cMpc (comoving mega-parsecs), in filamentary environments outside massive structures typical of web nodes.[73]

Some caution is required in describing structures on a cosmic scale because they are often different from how they appear. Gravitational lensing can make an image appear to originate in a different direction from its real source, when foreground objects curve surrounding spacetime (as predicted by general relativity) and deflect passing light rays. Rather usefully, strong gravitational lensing can sometimes magnify distant galaxies, making them easier to detect. Weak lensing by the intervening universe in general also subtly changes the observed large-scale structure.

The large-scale structure of the universe also looks different if only redshift is used to measure distances to galaxies. For example, galaxies behind a galaxy cluster are attracted to it and fall towards it, and so are blueshifted (compared to how they would be if there were no cluster). On the near side, objects are redshifted. Thus, the environment of the cluster looks somewhat pinched if using redshifts to measure distance. The opposite effect is observed on galaxies already within a cluster: the galaxies have some random motion around the cluster center, and when these random motions are converted to redshifts, the cluster appears elongated. This creates a "finger of God"—the illusion of a long chain of galaxies pointed at Earth.

Cosmography of Earth's cosmic neighborhood

edit

At the centre of the Hydra–Centaurus Supercluster, a gravitational anomaly called the Great Attractor affects the motion of galaxies over a region hundreds of millions of light-years across. These galaxies are all redshifted, in accordance with Hubble's law. This indicates that they are receding from us and from each other, but the variations in their redshift are sufficient to reveal the existence of a concentration of mass equivalent to tens of thousands of galaxies.

The Great Attractor, discovered in 1986, lies at a distance of between 150 million and 250 million light-years in the direction of the Hydra and Centaurus constellations. In its vicinity there is a preponderance of large old galaxies, many of which are colliding with their neighbours, or radiating large amounts of radio waves.

In 1987, astronomer R. Brent Tully of the University of Hawaii's Institute of Astronomy identified what he called the Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, a structure one billion light-years long and 150 million light-years across in which, he claimed, the Local Supercluster is embedded.[74]

Most distant objects

edit

The most distant astronomical object identified is a galaxy classified as MoM-z14,[75] at a redshift of 14.44. In 2009, a gamma ray burst, GRB 090423, was found to have a redshift of 8.2, which indicates that the collapsing star that caused it exploded when the universe was only 630 million years old.[76] The burst happened approximately 13 billion years ago,[77] so a distance of about 13 billion light-years was widely quoted in the media, or sometimes a more precise figure of 13.035 billion light-years.[76]

This would be the "light travel distance" (see Distance measures (cosmology)) rather than the "proper distance" used in both Hubble's law and in defining the size of the observable universe. Cosmologist Ned Wright argues against using this measure.[78] The proper distance for a redshift of 8.2 would be about 9.2 Gpc,[79] or about 30 billion light-years.

Horizons

edit

The limit of observability in the universe is set by cosmological horizons which limit—based on various physical constraints—the extent to which information can be obtained about various events in the universe. The most famous horizon is the particle horizon which sets a limit on the precise distance that can be seen due to the finite age of the universe. Additional horizons are associated with the possible future extent of observations, larger than the particle horizon owing to the expansion of space, an "optical horizon" at the surface of last scattering, and associated horizons with the surface of last scattering for neutrinos and gravitational waves.

A diagram of the Earth's location in the observable universe. (Alternative image.)
A logarithmic map of the observable universe. From left to right, spacecraft and celestial bodies are arranged according to their proximity to the Earth.
edit
Artist's logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe with the Solar System at the center, inner and outer planets, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri, Perseus Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda Galaxy, nearby galaxies, Cosmic web, Cosmic microwave radiation and the Big Bang's invisible plasma on the edge. Celestial bodies appear enlarged to appreciate their shapes.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Special relativity prevents nearby objects in the same local region from moving faster than the speed of light with respect to each other, but there is no such constraint for distant objects when the space between them is expanding; see uses of the proper distance for a discussion.
  2. ^ The comoving distance of the future visibility limit is calculated on p. 8 of Gott et al.'s A Map of the Universe to be 4.50 times the Hubble radius, given as 4.220 billion parsecs (13.76 billion light-years), whereas the current comoving radius of the observable universe is calculated on p. 7 to be 3.38 times the Hubble radius. The number of galaxies in a sphere of a given comoving radius is proportional to the cube of the radius, so as shown on p. 8 the ratio between the number of galaxies observable in the future visibility limit to the number of galaxies observable today would be (4.50/3.38)3 = 2.36.
  3. ^ This does not mean "unbounded" in the mathematical sense; a finite universe would have an upper bound on the distance between two points. Rather, it means that there is no boundary past which there is nothing. See Geodesic manifold.

References

edit
  1. ^ Itzhak Bars; John Terning (2009). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0387776378. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  2. ^ "Homepage". www.wolframalpha.com.[failed verification]
  3. ^ a b Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; et al. (2020). "Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 641: A6. arXiv:1807.06209. Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...6P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910.
  4. ^ Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; et al. (2020). "Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 641. page A6 (see PDF page 15, Table 2: "Age/Gyr", last column). arXiv:1807.06209. Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...6P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. S2CID 119335614.
  5. ^ Fixsen, D. J. (30 November 2009). "The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2): 916–920. arXiv:0911.1955. Bibcode:2009ApJ...707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916. S2CID 119217397.
  6. ^ "Planck cosmic recipe". European Space Agency. 2025-08-07.
  7. ^ a b c Gott III, J. Richard; Mario Juri?; David Schlegel; Fiona Hoyle; et al. (2005). "A Map of the Universe" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 624 (2): 463–484. arXiv:astro-ph/0310571. Bibcode:2005ApJ...624..463G. doi:10.1086/428890. S2CID 9654355.
  8. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions in Cosmology". astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  9. ^ a b c d Lineweaver, Charles; Davis, Tamara M. (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. 292 (3): 36–45. Bibcode:2005SciAm.292c..36L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0305-36.
  10. ^ See the "Mass of ordinary matter" section in this article.
  11. ^ Overbye, Dennis (3 December 2018). "All the Light There Is to See? 4 x 1084 Photons". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
  12. ^ Abdollahi, S.; Ackermann, M.; Ajello, M.; et al. (30 November 2018). "A gamma-ray determination of the Universe's star formation history". Science. 362 (6418): 1031–1034. arXiv:1812.01031. Bibcode:2018Sci...362.1031F. doi:10.1126/science.aat8123. PMID 30498122.
  13. ^ a b Loeb, Abraham (2002). "Long-term future of extragalactic astronomy". Physical Review D. 65 (4) 047301. arXiv:astro-ph/0107568. Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65d7301L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.047301. S2CID 1791226.
  14. ^ Liddle, Andrew (2015). An Introduction to Modern Cosmology. John Wiley. ISBN 978-1118502143.
  15. ^ Is the universe expanding faster than the speed of light? (see the last two paragraphs).
  16. ^ Krauss, Lawrence M.; Scherrer, Robert J. (2007). "The Return of a Static Universe and the End of Cosmology". General Relativity and Gravitation. 39 (10): 1545–1550. arXiv:0704.0221. Bibcode:2007GReGr..39.1545K. doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0472-9. S2CID 123442313.
  17. ^ Using Tiny Particles To Answer Giant Questions. Science Friday, 3 Apr 2009. According to the transcript, Brian Greene makes the comment "And actually, in the far future, everything we now see, except for our local galaxy and a region of galaxies will have disappeared. The entire universe will disappear before our very eyes, and it's one of my arguments for actually funding cosmology. We've got to do it while we have a chance."
  18. ^ See also Faster than light#Universal expansion and Future of an expanding universe#Galaxies outside the Local Supercluster are no longer detectable.
  19. ^ Siegel, Ethan. "How Much Of The Unobservable Universe Will We Someday Be Able To See?". Forbes. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  20. ^ Siegel, Ethan (2025-08-07). "94% of the universe's galaxies are permanently beyond our reach". Starts With A Bang!. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  21. ^ Ord, Toby (2021). "The Edges of Our Universe". arXiv:2104.01191 [gr-qc].
  22. ^ Kazanas, D. (1980). "Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking". The Astrophysical Journal. 241: L59 – L63. Bibcode:1980ApJ...241L..59K. doi:10.1086/183361.
  23. ^ Guth, Alan H. (1997). The inflationary universe: the quest for a new theory of cosmic origins. Basic Books. pp. 186–. ISBN 978-0201328400. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
  24. ^ Bielewicz, P.; Banday, A. J.; Gorski, K. M. (2013). Auge, E.; Dumarchez, J.; Tran Thanh Van, J. (eds.). "Constraints on the Topology of the Universe". Proceedings of the XLVIIth Rencontres de Moriond. 2012 (91). arXiv:1303.4004. Bibcode:2013arXiv1303.4004B.
  25. ^ Mota, B.; Reboucas, M. J.; Tavakol, R. (1 July 2010). "Observable circles-in-the-sky in flat universes". arXiv:1007.3466 [astro-ph.CO].
  26. ^ Malhotra, Sangeeta. "As far as the Hubble can see" (PDF). Arizona State University. Retrieved October 28, 2010.
  27. ^ "Search: 93 billion light years in parsecs". WolframAlpha. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
  28. ^ "Search: size of universe". WolframAlpha. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
  29. ^ "Search: (volume of universe) == (3.57x10^80 m^3) == (4.21594x10^5 Gly^3) == (1.2151x10^4 Gpc^3)". WolframAlpha. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
  30. ^ "Seven-Year Wilson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Sky Maps, Systematic Errors, and Basic Results" (PDF). nasa.gov. Retrieved 2025-08-07. (see p. 39 for a table of best estimates for various cosmological parameters).
  31. ^ Abbott, Brian (May 30, 2007). "Microwave (WMAP) All-Sky Survey". Hayden Planetarium. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  32. ^ Davies, Paul (1992). The new physics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 187–. ISBN 978-0521438315. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
  33. ^ Mukhanov, V. F. (2005). Physical foundations of cosmology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 58–. ISBN 978-0521563987. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
  34. ^ Bennett, C. L.; Larson, D.; Weiland, J. L.; Jarosik, N.; et al. (1 October 2013). "Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 208 (2): 20. arXiv:1212.5225. Bibcode:2013ApJS..208...20B. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20. S2CID 119271232.
  35. ^ Wright, Ned. "Light Travel Time Distance". astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  36. ^ Gunn, Alistair (29 November 2023). "How many galaxies are there in the universe? – Do astronomers know how many galaxies exist? How many can we see in the observable Universe?". BBC Sky at Night. Archived from the original on 3 December 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
  37. ^ "New Horizons spacecraft answers the question: How dark is space?". phys.org. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021.
  38. ^ Howell, Elizabeth (March 20, 2018). "How Many Galaxies Are There?". Space.com. Archived from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
  39. ^ "How Many Stars Are There In The Universe?". European Space Agency. 2019. Archived from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 21, 2019.
  40. ^ Marov, Mikhail Ya. (2015). "The Structure of the Universe". The Fundamentals of Modern Astrophysics. pp. 279–294. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8730-2_10. ISBN 978-1-4614-8729-6.
  41. ^ Mackie, Glen (February 1, 2002). "To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand". Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved January 28, 2017.
  42. ^ Mack, Eric (19 March 2015). "There may be more Earth-like planets than grains of sand on all our beaches – New research contends that the Milky Way alone is flush with billions of potentially habitable planets – and that's just one sliver of the universe". CNET. Archived from the original on 1 December 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  43. ^ Bovaird, T. T.; Lineweaver, C. H.; Jacobsen, S. K. (13 March 2015). "Using the inclinations of Kepler systems to prioritize new Titius–Bode-based exoplanet predictions". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 448 (4): 3608–3627. arXiv:1412.6230. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv221. Archived from the original on 1 December 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
  44. ^ Lauer, T. R.; Postman, M.; Spencer, J. R.; Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S. A.; Gladstone, G. R.; Binzel, R. P.; Britt, D. T.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Cheng, A. F.; Grundy, W. M.; Horányi, M.; Kavelaars, J. J.; Linscott, I. R.; Lisse, C. M.; McKinnon, W. B.; McNutt, R. L.; Moore, J. M.; Nú?ez, J. I.; Olkin, C. B.; Parker, J. W.; Porter, S. B.; Reuter, D. C.; Robbins, S. J.; Schenk, P. M.; Showalter, M. R.; Singer, K. N.; Verbiscer, A. J.; Young, L. A. (2022). "Anomalous Flux in the Cosmic Optical Background Detected with New Horizons Observations". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 927 (1): L8. arXiv:2202.04273. Bibcode:2022ApJ...927L...8L. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac573d.
  45. ^ Lauer, Todd (12 January 2021). "NOIRLab Scientist Finds the Universe to be Brighter than Expected". NOIRLab. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
  46. ^ Lauer, Tod R.; Postman, Marc; Weaver, Harold A.; Spencer, John R.; Stern, S. Alan; Buie, Marc W.; Durda, Daniel D.; Lisse, Carey M.; Poppe, A. R.; Binzel, Richard P.; Britt, Daniel T.; Buratti, Bonnie J.; Cheng, Andrew F.; Grundy, W. M.; Horányi, Mihaly; Kavelaars, J. J.; Linscott, Ivan R.; McKinnon, William B.; Moore, Jeffrey M.; Nú?ez, J. I.; Olkin, Catherine B.; Parker, Joel W.; Porter, Simon B.; Reuter, Dennis C.; Robbins, Stuart J.; Schenk, Paul; Showalter, Mark R.; Singer, Kelsi N.; Verbiscer, Anne J.; Young, Leslie A. (11 January 2021). "New Horizons Observations of the Cosmic Optical Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 906 (2): 77. arXiv:2011.03052. Bibcode:2021ApJ...906...77L. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc881. hdl:1721.1/133770. S2CID 226277978.
  47. ^ Totani, Tomonori (3 February 2020). "Emergence of life in an inflationary universe". Scientific Reports. 10 (1671) 1671. arXiv:1911.08092. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.1671T. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58060-0. PMC 6997386. PMID 32015390.
  48. ^ There are about 1082 atoms in the observable universeLiveScience, July 2021
  49. ^ Davies, Paul (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma. First Mariner Books. p. 43–. ISBN 978-0618592265.
  50. ^ See Friedmann equations#Density parameter.
  51. ^ Kaku, Michio (2006). Parallel Worlds: A Journey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, and the Future of the Cosmos. Knopf Doubleday. p. 385. ISBN 978-0307276988.
  52. ^ Schutz, Bernard F. (2003). Gravity from the ground up. Cambridge University Press. pp. 361–. ISBN 978-0521455060.
  53. ^ Ade, P. A. R.; Aghanim, N.; Armitage-Caplan, C. (2013). "Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 571: A16. arXiv:1303.5076. Bibcode:2014A&A...571A..16P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591. S2CID 118349591.
  54. ^ "Galactic treasure chest". www.spacetelescope.org. Retrieved 13 August 2018.
  55. ^ "Blueprints of the Universe". www.eso.org. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
  56. ^ Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2013). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (International ed.). Pearson. p. 1178. ISBN 978-1292022932.
  57. ^ a b Kirshner, Robert P. (2002). The Extravagant Universe: Exploding Stars, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Cosmos. Princeton University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0691058627.
  58. ^ "Map of the Cosmic Web Generated from Slime Mould Algorithm". www.spacetelescope.org.
  59. ^ Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2013). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (International ed.). Pearson. pp. 1173–1174. ISBN 978-1292022932.
  60. ^ Geller, M. J.; Huchra, J. P. (1989). "Mapping the universe". Science. 246 (4932): 897–903. Bibcode:1989Sci...246..897G. doi:10.1126/science.246.4932.897. PMID 17812575. S2CID 31328798.
  61. ^ Ananthaswamy, Anil. "Biggest void in space is 1 billion light years across". New Scientist. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  62. ^ Wall, Mike (2025-08-07). "Largest structure in universe discovered". Fox News.
  63. ^ a b Horváth, I.; Hakkila, Jon; Bagoly, Z. (2014). "Possible structure in the GRB sky distribution at redshift two". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 561: L12. arXiv:1401.0533. Bibcode:2014A&A...561L..12H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323020. S2CID 24224684.
  64. ^ Horvath, I.; Hakkila, J.; Bagoly, Z. (2013). "The largest structure of the Universe, defined by Gamma-Ray Bursts". arXiv:1311.1104 [astro-ph.CO].
  65. ^ Klotz, Irene (2025-08-07). "Universe's Largest Structure is a Cosmic Conundrum". Discovery. Archived from the original on 2025-08-07. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  66. ^ Ferreira, Becky (2025-08-07). "A Structure In Deep Space Is So Giant It's Challenging Standard Physics". Vice.
  67. ^ Debono, Ivan; Smoot, George (2025-08-07). "General Relativity and Cosmology: Unsolved Questions and Future Directions". Universe. 2 (4): 23. arXiv:1609.09781. Bibcode:2016Univ....2...23D. doi:10.3390/universe2040023. ISSN 2218-1997.
  68. ^ Abdalla, Elcio; Abellán, Guillermo Franco; Aboubrahim, Amin; Agnello, Adriano; Akarsu, ?zgür; Akrami, Yashar; Alestas, George; Aloni, Daniel; Amendola, Luca; Anchordoqui, Luis A.; Anderson, Richard I.; Arendse, Nikki; Asgari, Marika; Ballardini, Mario; Barger, Vernon (2025-08-07). "Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies". Journal of High Energy Astrophysics. 34: 49–211. arXiv:2203.06142. Bibcode:2022JHEAp..34...49A. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002. ISSN 2214-4048.
  69. ^ Natalie Wolchover, "The Universe Isn't a Fractal, Study Finds", LiveScience.com, 22 August 2012.
  70. ^ Jarrett, T. H. (2004). "Large Scale Structure in the Local Universe: The 2MASS Galaxy Catalog". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 21 (4): 396–403. arXiv:astro-ph/0405069. Bibcode:2004PASA...21..396J. doi:10.1071/AS04050. S2CID 56151100.
  71. ^ Hamden, Erika (4 October 2019). "Observing the cosmic web". Science. 366 (6461): 31–32. Bibcode:2019Sci...366...31H. doi:10.1126/science.aaz1318. PMID 31604290. S2CID 203717729.
  72. ^ Byrd, Deborah (6 October 2019). "Cosmic Web Fuels Stars And Supermassive Black Holes". earthsky.org.
  73. ^ Bacon, R.; Mary, D.; Garel, T.; Blaizot, J.; et al. (18 March 2021). "The MUSE Extremely Deep Field: The cosmic web in emission at high redshift". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 647 (A107): A107. arXiv:2102.05516. Bibcode:2021A&A...647A.107B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039887. S2CID 231861819. This first detection of the cosmic web structure in Lyα emission in typical filamentary environments, namely outside massive structures typical of web nodes, is a milestone in the long search for the cosmic web signature at high z. This has been possible because of the unprecedented faint surface brightness of 5 × 10?20 erg s?1 cm?2 arcsec?2 achieved by 140 h MUSE observations on the VLT.
  74. ^ Wilford, John Noble (November 10, 1987). "Massive Clusters of Galaxies Defy Concepts of the Universe". The New York Times.
  75. ^ Naidu, Rohan P.; Oesch, Pascal A.; Brammer, Gabriel; Weibel, Andrea; Li, Yijia; Matthee, Jorryt; Chisholm, John; Pollock, Clara L.; Heintz, Kasper E. (2025-08-07). "A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST". arXiv:2505.11263 [astro-ph.GA].
  76. ^ a b "New Gamma-Ray Burst Smashes Cosmic Distance Record | Science Mission Directorate". science.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 2025-08-07. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  77. ^ Atkinson, Nancy (2025-08-07). "More Observations of GRB 090423, the Most Distant Known Object in the Universe". Universe Today. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  78. ^ "Light Travel Time Distance". www.astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
  79. ^ Meszaros, Attila; et al. (2009). "Impact on cosmology of the celestial anisotropy of the short gamma-ray bursts". Baltic Astronomy. 18: 293–296. arXiv:1005.1558. Bibcode:2009BaltA..18..293M.

Further reading

edit
edit
脂肪肝是什么症状 jk制服什么意思 私奔是什么意思 6月30日是什么节日 3月10日什么星座
和尚化缘的碗叫什么 肾阳虚吃什么药最好 子宫囊肿是什么原因引起的 8月7日是什么星座 散光400度是什么概念
女人胯骨疼是什么原因 椰子煲鸡汤放什么材料 吃什么东西能通便 怎么算自己五行缺什么 什么样的葡萄
白雪什么 又吐又拉是什么原因 什么是修行 整装是什么意思 铜绿是什么
曦字五行属什么hcv7jop9ns6r.cn 环移位了会出现什么症状hcv7jop6ns3r.cn 笄礼是什么意思hcv7jop4ns6r.cn 粉盒和硒鼓有什么区别hkuteam.com 下面干涩是什么原因导致的hcv7jop5ns4r.cn
师傅是什么意思xinmaowt.com 急性心肌炎有什么症状hcv8jop5ns8r.cn 嘴唇发乌是什么原因hcv8jop5ns5r.cn 同病相怜是什么意思inbungee.com 魄力是什么意思hcv7jop5ns0r.cn
梦到扫地是什么意思hcv9jop0ns2r.cn 什么水什么什么hcv8jop0ns9r.cn 健康证查什么hcv9jop5ns5r.cn 学信网上的报告编号是什么hcv9jop2ns0r.cn 尿多是什么原因男性hcv7jop9ns3r.cn
cea检查是什么意思gangsutong.com 慕名而来是什么意思hcv8jop5ns4r.cn 手足口挂什么科hcv7jop6ns8r.cn 水厄痣是什么意思hcv9jop4ns5r.cn 柔式按摩是什么意思hcv9jop7ns9r.cn
百度